David Duke videos and commentaries

[FREE ZUNDEL NOW]

(left)The radical Jewish supremacist hate group, Chabad Lubavitch, erects a huge Menorah in front of White House. (Right) Jewish extremist and torture advocate, U.S. Attorney General Michael Mukasey, lights the first flame.

Huge Jewish Menorah Lit in front of White House
While the Cross is outlawed on public ground – huge Jewish Menorahs are erected!

On December 4th a huge Menorah was erected and lit in front of the America’s White House. A radical Jewish supremacist organization called Chabad Lubavitch sponsored the menorah and it was lit by the prominent Jewish extremist and torture advocate, the new U.S. Attorney General Michael Mukasey.In America you cannot put a Christian cross on public ground; no symbol representing any aspect of the Christian religion is allowed. Christmas manger scenes, for example, have long been deemed illegal.

But while crosses are banned from the White House and any public place, huge Jewish Menorahs are going up by the thousands all over the United States as well as in many European countries. One of the main groups erecting them is Chabad Lubavitch, an organization that teaches that Gentiles are a lower and different species from Jews and that Gentiles entire purpose on earth is only to “serve Jews.”�”� (read the following article on Chabad on www.davidduke.com)

Menorahs are now erected in most hallowed places of many respective nations. You can find them in front of many European parliaments and government buildings. A huge Menorah is now in front of the White House and hundreds more adorn government buildings, both state and federal and local all over America.

The Menorah is symbol intrinsic with the Jewish religion, and long before the creation of the modern state of Israel, the Menorah was the most common symbol of the Jewish religion, it has been used for centuries as symbol of Jewish organizations all over the world.

Menorahs symbolize what the Jewish religion calls miracle of the lamps and commemorates the Jewish military victory over the Greeks and the recapture of the Jewish temple which is now celebrated as the Jewish religious holiday of Hanukkah. The Jewish religion views Hanukkah’s meaning as commemorating Jewish resistance to the threat of intermarriage and assimilation. Instead of persecuting Jews, the Greeks of Syria accepted them and allowed them to assimilate and because of this the rabbis waged war and massacred them.

Hanukkah is used by the Jewish faith as a lesson against intermarriage with Christians. Imagine for a moment if any Christian Politician would condemn the marriage of Christians to Jews, or would suggest that America should not let Jews assimilate into our nation. The fact that Jewish extremists routinely get away with these double standards is only understandable when one recognizes that Jewish supremacy in many areas of the American media. They can focus on what they want, hide what they want.

When President Bush was campaigning for President in his first election, he was roundly criticized for speaking at the Christian, Bob Jones University. It was brought out that BJU opposed interracial or inter-religious dating or marriage. Bush had to make a servile apology to the Jewish press for his appearance. Yet, the very next week he was speaking before powerful national Jewish organizations such as the American Jewish Committee, an organization that spends millions in opposing intermarriage between Jews and non-Jews. Practically every major Jewish organization in America has gone on record as opposing Jewish intermarriage with non-Jews. Of course, there was no outcry in the controlled press against Bush for speaking at these Jewish extremist groups, and every major candidate for president has to genuflect before the radical, pro-Israel radical Jewish groups that wield so much political, financial and media power in America.

President Bush learned his lesson and helped light the anti-assimilationist Jewish menorah in the White House, accompanied by members of the Jewish hate-group called Chabad Lubavitch. Could you imagine President Bush lighting candles in the shape of the cross in ceremony opposing Jewish assimilation in Gentile society, but somehow there is no problem in lighting a symbol that opposes Jewish assimilation from a Jewish perspective.

Chabad Lubavitch is a powerful Jewish extremist group with branches in every major city of Europe and America and even with branches for Jews in far away cities such as Peking and New Delhi. Here are two excerpts from their website on the Menorah erections around the world.

Chabad Lubavitch sponsored Menorah at the KremlinPublic menorah lightings were initiated and promoted by the Lubavitcher Rebbe, Rabbi Menachem Schneerson, of righteous memory. Today, more than 10,000 public squares around the world are illuminated by Menorahs placed by Chabad Lubavitch.

From Giant Menorah Lit in Front of the Kremlin http://www.fjc.ru/news/newsArticle.asp?AID=606436

In a tradition started by the Lubavitcher Rebbe to publicize and popularize the Festival of Lights, Chabad has brought the menorah to be lit in the White House, the Kremlin, the Brandenburg Gate, in Iraq, embassies, consulates, State Houses, college campuses, army bases, ball games, shopping malls, and more.

From Chabad To Light Menorah In Polish Parliament (Sejm)http://lubavitch.com/article/2021310/Chabad-To-Light-Menorah-In-Polish-Parliament-Sejm.html

Chabad Lubavitch sponsored a huge Menorah in Zagreb with Chabad claiming that Croatia can’t enter the EU unless Croatia builds a huge synagogue.

Of course no Christian organization could claim, to put special holiday crosses in thousands of public squares as most of these nations would forbid any overt Christian symbols, yet strangely, Jewish supremacist symbols are not only permitted they are approved and celebrated by the top political leaders of European nations. Why?

The answer to that question will lead to answers of many other questions that challenge us. Let’s take a glimpse into Chabad Lubavitch which has an inside track to most political leaders in the European world, the same organizations that put up the Menorahs that are clearly illegal in most countries.

The New Republic in a May 4, 1992 article revealed the hateful anti-Gentile nature of Chabad Lubavitch.

…there are some powerful ironies in Chabad’s new messianic universalism, in its mission to the gentiles; and surely the most unpleasant of them concerns Chabad’s otherwise undisguised and even racial contempt for the goyim.

…Moreover, this characterization of gentiles as being inherently evil, as being spiritually as well as biologically inferior to Jews, has not in any way been revised in later Chabad writing. (The New Republic)

Chabad and other extremist orthodox rabbis frequently author columns in the largest Jewish newspaper in the United States, Jewish Week. In this paper you will find supremacist attitudes that any decent human being would call horrific. Examine the following quote:

“Gentile souls are of a completely different and inferior order. They are totally evil, with no redeeming qualities whatsoever.”�”� …If every simple cell in a Jewish body entails divinity, is a part of God, then every strand of DNA is a part of God. Therefore, something is special about Jewish DNA. … If a Jew needs a liver, can you take the liver of an innocent non-Jew passing by to save him? The Torah would probably permit that. Jewish life has an infinite value,”�”� he explained. “There is something infinitely more holy and unique about Jewish life than non-Jewish life. – Chabad Lubavitch Rabbi Yitzhak Ginsburgh in Jewish Week, the largest Jewish publication in the United States.

This Statement was made by a leading Lubavitch Rabbi named Yitshak Ginsburgh and it can be found in the April 26, 1996 Jewish Week. Many Christians would doubt the authenticity of the quote simply because they could not believe any religious leader would actually say that it would be moral for a Jew to kill a Gentile and take his liver. In many of my lectures, I bring home the horror of what Rabbi Ginsburgh said by pointing out to the non-Jews in the audience that he argues that Jews have the moral right to murder your mother or father, son or daughter, husband or wife to provide a liver for a Jew. The evil of such a statement is simply beyond the comprehension of most of us, but again, this statement was made in largest, most popular Jewish publication in the United States, the same organization that is sponsoring the illegal Menorahs in front of the White House and in many other nations.

For simply quoting Ginsburgh and exposing Jewish supremacism in my writings and lectures I have been condemned as a hater, anti-Semite and a bigot. I must endure this treatment by the media while Ginsburgh himself has received hardly a whiff of criticism. His statement was not one of a lone extremist Jew off somewhere in a remote desert of Israel, but was made by one of the honored leaders of a sect that actually has parties and conferences in the White House.

As far as Hanukkah is concerned, let me quote to you from a typical Jewish accounting of it. I take this quote from Zipple: the Jewish Supersite. Here are some excerpts:

That’s not to say that Chanukah isn’t important. After all, the eight-day holiday celebrates the Jewish military victory against the Syrians…, Underlying Chanukah is a theme just as central today as it was 2,000 years ago, the fight against assimilation. Today, just as then, Jews are well accepted; the Maccabees revolted not only against the ruling Syrians, but against the prevailing Jewish practice of Hellenization.

See, Jewish writers define the Hanukkah celebration as one to encourage resistance to assimilation among Gentiles, a battle as vital today as the one that went on 2000 years ago. The word Hellenization could be interchangeable with Americanization.

You see, everyone else in the world that comes to America is supposed to be quote, “Americanized, ”�”� everyone of course except the Jews. For them we are supposed to say isn’t it great that they want to maintain their separateness and not merge into the great melting of races and creeds in America!

Any Gentile who would dare to say that Jews want to remain separate and not truly assimilate into American culture would be labeled an anti-Semite. If that’s true, I guess almost every Jewish organization is quote “anti-Semitic, because all of them preach against intermarriage and assimilation.
The fact-of-the-matter is that Hanukkah is an extremely ethno-phobic celebration of a Jewish military victory and massacre of the pro-Greek Syrians. While a billion Christians celebrate peace on earth, good will to men, the Hanukkah celebration celebrates annihilation of Jewish enemies. I am not exaggerating in the least bit.

Most of the Jewish holidays are celebrations of massacres of their enemies. Seems odd, doesn’t it, for a religion to revere military victories as their most sacred times.

In fact, the meaning given to Hanukkah by almost all Jewish leaders and scholars is that Hanukkah symbolizes the resistance of the assimilation of the Jewish people, religion and culture. That in itself is not so bad; all people who want to maintain their traditions, culture and even the heritage of their children should resist assimilation. Somehow, the same rules are not supposed to apply to people of European descent. Jewish supremacists, in recognizing Hanukkah, promote the idea that Jews need to keep themselves pure, and non-assimilated. We Europeans are supposed to have our people and culture become assimilated and subsumed every race on earth, but they are supposed to resist assimilation at all costs. Anyone who can think well enough to recognize this hypocrisy should realize its implications in the Jewish extremist power wielded in media and politics. Why is this hypocrisy never exposed in our supposedly free media? Why is exposing Jewish intolerance, supremacism and racial hatred considered in itself intolerant?

Any resistance we have to losing our genetic and cultural heritage through assimilation is called chauvinism, intolerance and ultimately racism by the media. Jewish resistance to assimilation is called “heroic”�”� and worthy of solemn ceremony and celebration. Bush trumpeted that he was committed to Israel as a Jewish state. Note, he did not say multicultural state, diverse state, but as an all caps JEWISH state, which of course it is. With three million Palestinians living under an oppressive Israeli military occupation, some even still dare to call Israel the only democracy in the Mideast, tell that to the 3 million who suffer under a brutal occupation that steals their land and water, imprisons and tortures thousands and that controls almost every aspect ot their lives.

What is so incredibly hypocritical about the whole thing is that the same media that lauds assimilation and diversity for European Americans has no problem with Jews resisting assimilation in the countries in which they dwell. Of course, that is because the media is dominated by the same group that celebrates Hanukkah. Most of the Jewish groups promoting Hanukkah do so use it as a lesson to vigorously condemn intermarriage between Jews and Gentiles.

Imagine for a moment if there was a White House ceremony that symbolized White rejection of assimilation and multiculturalism and condemned intermarriage of Whites with Jews. Do you think the media would be silent?

Or how about if Bush Welcomed to the White House the Gentile equivalent of Jewish supremacists called Israel Identity and they had a religious ceremony celebrating opposition to Jews mixing or assimilating with them?
Every major Jewish organization in the world has programs dedicated to preventing intermarriage of Jews and non-Jews.

How often are they compared to those organizations of Whites who oppose intermarriage?

How many times have you seen the Hollywood stereotype of the evil White Southerner opposed to race-mixing?

How many times have you seen the pervasive Jewish supremacism condemned by media?

How many of you listening to this broadcast or reading this know that by law in Israel Jews and non-Jews cannot marry?

Has any media proposed stopping aid to Israel as long as this continues?
How many times has the media dared to compare those Israeli laws to the old anti-intermarriage laws in most of the American states?

How are these double standards maintained without any outcry?

In truth the double standards that we witness every day in our nation reveal the extent of Jewish power and influence over our media, government and culture.

And how can the government of the U.S. forbid Christian crosses but put up Jewish religious symbols of supremacism and hate?

The answer to all these questions is quite evident.

The government and media of the United States are influenced mightily by the same Jewish extremists who exercise these double standards.

We here at Davidduke.com are committed to telling the truth on this vital subject no matter what the political or personal cost!

DavidDuke.com

Source Link

[FREE ZUNDEL NOW]

A stupendous show on this topic came from Dr. Duke and James Edwards!

Dr. David Duke On The Political Cesspool 12/14/07!
FIRST HOUR: (GUEST) REP. DAVID DUKE - Former Louisiana Representative David Duke will be making a live appearance via telephone from Italy in order to discuss the War Against Christmas and the egregious double standards that the ADL and other radical organizations are advocating. ( * NOTE * We played an extended medley of Christmas songs at the beginning of tonight’s broadcast. If you wish to bypass the music and go directly to the interview, please use your cursor to scroll exactly 10 minutes, 41 seconds, into the audio stream. Thanks!) SECOND HOUR: GUEST REP. DAVID DUKE (Cont.) - James Edwards and David Duke lead you into the weekend!

[FREE ZUNDEL NOW]

February 29th, 2008
Why I oppose Obama as President of the United States
David Duke -- MP3

Barack Obama has stressed continually that he is a candidate for President for “all the people”�”� and for the new day of a “colorblind society.”�”� It is the identical rhetoric used by every serious candidate both Democrat and Republican. In order to win a significant percentage of the 70 percent White electorate that he needs, what else could he say? But, does Obama really mean it? Or, is it just another lie in what must qualify as the most hypocritical profession on earth: politics?

Compelling evidence shows that Barack Obama is an Afro-American whose ultimate loyalty is not to “all the people of the United States,”�”� but primarily to his fellow African-Americans.

A candidate with racial loyalty is not extraordinary in itself, but it is quite amazing in a nation in which it is presented as the worst of crimes.

Apparently though, according to the media and the political establishment, racial loyalty is only reprehensible when practiced by we White folks, the descendants of our European American forefathers.

The media has given Obama a free pass on his participation and close association with Black racist organizations and leaders. Few Americans are even aware yet of this side of Obama. Here is quick rundown of the undisputed facts:

Barack Obama is an active member of an extremist, Afro-Centrist Black church in Chicago and is admittedly very close to its Afro-centrist and unarguably (by media standards) racist pastor, the Rev. Jeremiah A. Wright, Jr. Obama has frequently spoken of his closeness to Rev. Wright, Jr. and his active important participation in the church. He credits Rev. Wright and his church as having a vital role in the development of his own religious faith as well as his moral and ethical convictions.

Obama’s church proudly proclaims its quote “Blackness”�”� and its ultimate loyalty to what it refers to as Black people, Black culture, the Black family, the Black community, Black institutions, Black values, and Black ethics.


On the church’s Internet homepage, in the first section titled, “About Us,”�”� its first sentence denotes the church as unashamedly Black, and then goes on in the next sentence to proclaim:

…We are an African people, and remain "true to our native land," the mother continent, the cradle of civilization.

Obama’s church promotes what it calls a Black value system and Black ethics that must be promoted wherever Blacks are gathered. It advances 12 principles

1. Commitment to God
2. Commitment to the Black Community
3. Commitment to the Black Family
4. Dedication to the Pursuit of Education
5. Dedication to the Pursuit of Excellence
6. Adherence to the Black Work Ethic
7. Commitment to Self-Discipline and Self-Respect
8. Disavowal of the Pursuit of "Middleclassness"
9. Pledge to make the fruits of all developing and acquired skills available to the Black Community
10. Pledge to Allocate Regularly, a Portion of Personal Resources for Strengthening and Supporting Black Institutions
11. Pledge allegiance to all Black leadership who espouse and embrace the Black Value System
12. Personal commitment to embracement of the Black Value System.

Although I am incorrectly labelled a racist and White supremacist by the media, I don’t think I have ever written a short article in my entire life that ever used the word White in it as much as Obama’s church uses the word Black!

Could you imagine the media reaction to a candidate who was an active member of a church proclaiming itself to be “unashamedly White,”�”� whose commitment is to the “White community, White family, White work ethic, White institutions, and White values.”�”�

In another section, the church’s Ten Point Vision there is not a word about commitment to America, negotiable or non-negotiable, but the pastor and all the church’s members pledge their support to a ten-point vision which includes a “non-negotiable”�”� commitment to Africa.

4. A congregation with a non-negotiable COMMITMENT TO AFRICA.

Now those sentiments might be acceptable for a candidate named Barack Obama running for President of the Congo, but are they not preposterous for a man running for President of the United States?

In addition to his very close relationship with Rev. Wright, Obama also has a long and warm friendship with Louis Farrakhan, who is also unashamedly a Black nationalist and Afro-centrist. Although, I am not what the media makes me out to be, could you imagine the deafening media outrage if any White Democrat or Republican candidate would maintain even a cordial, even if remote friendship with me? Just a photo of President Bush or Hillary Clinton shaking my hand would cause a media storm of denunciation.
It is true that in a recent debate he was forced to condemn Farrakhan’s anti-Semitism and slavishly throw himself in subservience to the new God of Zionist supremacism. But, everyone knows that there is a tacit acknowledgment between Farrakhan and Obama that Obama must do what is necessary to get elected, and that can’t happen unless one genuflects before Jewish supremacism.

His relationship with his racist pastor, his racist church and Minister Farrakhan should be enough to raise huge criticism, yet there is another Black racist, and dedicated Black separatist that Obama shares an even closer relationship: his wife Michelle Obama.

Michelle Obama: Black Nationalist, Separatist

During the campaign, Mrs. Michelle Obama made a very revealing off-hand comment. The comment was so fundamental and natural to her sentiments that she couldn’t image that any negative response could come as a result of it.

She said:

“"For the first time in my adult lifetime, I am really proud of my country." -- Michelle Obama

Come again? Presumably she is proud of America for the first time in her adult life because of the popularity her African-American husband received in his quest for President of the United States.

Let’s see. Michelle Obama was never proud of America when she read of the American Founding Fathers who heroically founded this nation and the wonderful rights and liberties they enshrined in our Declaration of Independence and Bill of Rights.

She never had a moment of pride when she became aware that for the first time in history the footsteps of mankind were put on the surface of the moon, and that those incredible footsteps were made by Americans.
She has never felt pride in America for the thousands of scientific, technological and medical advancements that our people created and that she benefits from every day of her life.

There are thousands of things Michelle Obama could have felt pride in as an American, but she says she has never even once felt that pride until Barack found fame and fortune.

To be completely honest, there are some things in recent years that Americans should have no pride about. They include the terribly high crime rate in America, the rates of rape, molesting and kidnapping of children, of robbery and assault, intolerable crime rates that are the worst in the Western World.

There can be no pride in the rampant drug abuse and addiction in America, the mainstreaming of pornography, the immorality and ugliness of the new American values of greed and immorality that belch out to the rest of the world from the cesspools of Hollywood and New York. No patriotic or decent American can be proud of the murderous foreign policy waged in the name of America, but one that only hurts and bankrupts our own people and our nation as it hurts much of the world. No American should be proud of the fact that our government now admits to torture of suspects. We cannot feel pride in the betrayal of our boys in a war in Iraq based on lies and the sacrifice of our men and women for Israel rather than America.

We cannot feel any pride in the sickening U.S. government support of the terrorist State of Israel, a state that has even committed terrorism against our own America in the Lavon Affair and the USS Liberty attack.
Michelle Obama has every right to be upset about the course America has taken, but for her to say that she has never in her entire adult life felt any pride for America until now reveals a deep hatred for America and European people who created her prosperous lifestyle and educational opportunities, is the height of ingratitude.

I can feel proud of many things as an American, but I have no pride in the massive death and agony inflicted on both North and South in the oppressive war waged by the North against the human right of the Southern people to have independence and freely choose their own government, the founding principle of America itself.

Concerning this American historical event that I loathe, the so-called “Civil War,”�”� Michelle Obama can find no sense of pride in the enormous sacrifice America made in no small part for her people.

Michelle is not even appreciative that America gave her an undeserved, affirmative action admission into Princeton University undoubtedly more qualified European Americans. Her senior thesis which has just now come to light shows her remarkable incompetence after four years at prestigious Princeton University. It is hard to believe that a paper that a Princeton senior would labor over for months would be so full of junior high school types of errors. But, it is not the errors we need to concentrate on here, but the personal sentiment she expresses in her thesis.

The Obama Campaign tried to keep her thesis from the public, and the Princeton Library listed it as unavailable until Election Day, Nov 5, 2008. What did they not want Americans not to know about until after the election was over?

Luckily, because of the Internet, they realized that the thesis would get out anyway, so they made it available to a pro-Obama website to cushion its impact. The mainstream press has completely ignored its Black nationalist content.

In it, Michelle Obama writes about an individual’s motivation and values. She says,

“Some individuals may place the highest value on benefiting themselves or their families. Others may value their occupational fields most highly. Others may place God before everything else. In still other instances, one’s motivation to benefit either the U.S. society, the non-White races of the world or the human species…”�”�

She goes on to write about what she personally holds as her highest motivation. It is not God, U.S. society, or even the human species as whole. She writes:

“…there is no doubt in my mind that as a member of the Black community I was somehow obligated to this community and would utilize all of my present and future resources to benefit this community first and foremost.”�”�

Ironically, in just a few lines after she announces that she that puts her Black community first and foremost, she writes:

“My experiences at Princeton have made me far more aware of my “Blackness”�”� than ever before. I have found that at Princeton no matter how liberal and open-minded some of my White professors and classmates try to be toward me, I sometimes feel like a visitor on campus; as if I really don’t belong. Regardless of the circumstances under which I interact with Whites at Princeton, it often seems as if, to them, I will always be Black first and a student second.”�”�

It is beyond me how she can fault Whites for thinking that she is precisely what she herself admits.

Michelle Obama goes on to support Black Power and separatism in her thesis:

“Stokely Carmichael [famous for his strident advocacy of “Black Power”�”�] and Charles Hamilton’s (1967) developed definitions of separationism in their discussion of Black Power…guided me in the formulation and use of this concept in the study.”�”�

Mrs. Obama also clearly defends separatist over integrationist Blacks

“…a separationist is more likely to have a realistic impression of the plight of the Black lower class because of the likelihood that a separationist is more closely associated with the Black lower class than are integrationist[s]. By actually working with the Black lower class or within their communities as a result of their ideologies, a separationist may better understand the desparation [sic- typical of hundreds of errors in the paper] of their situation and feel more hopeless about a resolution as opposed to an integrationist who is ignorant to their plight.”�”�

I have no problem with Obama’s Michelle being a Black nationalist, loyal, as she says, to the Black community “first and foremost.”�”� I have no problem with Obama being a leading member of a church whose central mission statement says its true loyalty is to “Africa, Black people, the Black community, the Black family, black institutions, Black ethics and Black values.”�”�

I do, however, have a problem with someone harboring these views being President of the United States, a nation with a European American majority.

Obama is able to get away with his associations and views because the American media and political establishment are an anti-White establishment constantly betraying true European American interests in almost every vital area. The establishment promotes an enforced, anti-White racial discrimination called affirmative action. It promotes the destruction of White schools and neighborhoods with forced integration, the destruction and defilement of White heritage and values in academic and media, and the literal physical destruction our people and heritage with massive non-European immigration that will cause our children to someday walk as strangers in their own land.

The media establishment does not worry about Obama’s anti-White, Black racism, and in fact most of the Jewish Hollywood crowd that has given him millions of dollars hates European heritage more than he does. Michelle and Obama are amateurs at anti-European feeling. His Jewish extremist supporters have inherited an anti-Western hatred passed down since the time of the Roman destruction of their temple in Jerusalem.

Their important criterion is that Obama passes the litmus test of American politics: subservience to Israel. Obama has thus genuflected and bowed subserviently to the real power that greases the money and media wheels of American politics. He has already filled his campaign with the obligatory Jewish advisers, softened his position on getting out of Iraq, wants more Americans deployed around the world, beat the drums of war against Israel’s great enemy: Iran. He has promised Israel and the Jewish supremacists that they don’t have to worry about his Afro-centric church or his friendship with Farrakhan because he knows where his loyalty must ultimately lie if they will make him president. His largest single contributor, by far, is the radical Jewish, New York investment firm of Goldmann, Sachs. He has long been bought and paid for.

The fact that he can be shielded in media and politics from legitimate criticism for his views and associations is extremely symbolic of the control of those of the same affiliation as the bosses of Goldmann, Sachs.
The rise of Obama is starkly symbolic of the absence of a legitimate European American perspective in the media establishment or in the American political process.

Dr. David Duke

___________________________

David Duke on the Alan Colmes Radio Program!
In the radio program Dr. Duke discusses the Obama candidacy and his association with Black racist organizations and individuals. Also, be sure to read and listen David Duke’s new article and broadcast on Barack Obama, now available.
Hear David Duke’s Interview with Alan Colmes (2/29/08)

DavidDuke.com

[Glacier]

http://www.stormfront.org/forum/show...05&postcount=1

[FREE ZUNDEL NOW]

A shocking report:

Photo: Lauren Burk, a freshman at Auburn
University and Eva Carson of UNC. Also
pictured are their accused murderers.

The Racial Murder and Rape of White Women in America

How the so-called “Civil Rights” Movement in America has led to loss of the most important civil right of all: life.

The almost simultaneous murders of White co-eds at two different, prominent universities, Auburn and University of North Carolina, should bring attention to an epidemic of brutal African-American crimes against White women in the United States.

The murder of Eve Carson, Student Body President of UNC has shocked her campus and its surrounding community to its core. Ms. Carson was found murdered in the middle of an intersection just outside downtown Chapel Hill on Wednesday, March 5th. Her body ... which had two gunshot wounds, including one to the head, laid just a mile away from her SUV, which was left abandoned. Bank ATM video revealed that the murderer-carjacker, an African American, apparently attempted to get cash from Carson’s stolen ATM card shortly after the crime.

In a similar recent incident, police arrested another African American attacker, Courtney L. Lockhart, 23, for the grisly murder and attempted rape of Auburn University freshman co-ed, Lauren Burk, on March 4. Courtney was arrested on March 7 after having brutally pistol-whipped the face of another White victim, 72-year-old Marjorie Llewellyn of Newnan, Alabama and briefly kidnapping her at gunpoint during an armed robbery and attempted carjacking earlier in the day.

The recent murders of two White coeds at major universities by Black predators underscore a racial reality that the mass media in America hides from the public: the tens of millions of White victims of Black criminality in America. Over the past four decades since the “civil rights” movement, crime figures show that millions of crimes have been committed by Blacks and other non-White predators against White people. The crimes include robbery, assault, rape and murder.

The racial component of crime in America has been largely ignored. It took a major newspaper outside of America to address the shocking epidemic Black crime in America. ( See The Race War of Black Against White by Paul Sheehan from the Sydney Morning Herald)

http://www.davidduke.com/race-information-library/the-race-war-of-black-against-white_75.html

Black crime rates against White people are many times greater than White crimes against Blacks. You wouldn’t know it by reading or listening to America’s mass media. Saturation national and international news coverage is given to the very few White cross-race crimes against Blacks such as the James Byrd dragging case in Texas, as well as the media-hyped Tawana Brawley case in New Jersey and the alleged rape of a Black stripper by White lacrosse team members at Duke University. Both of those latter cases, after months of front-page, sensationalized coverage decrying “White racism,” turned out to be complete hoaxes.

There is an incredible disproportionate rate of Black crimes against Whites in contrast to White crimes against Blacks. Per capita Black cross racial crimes of 50 or even 100 percent greater than Whites would be bad enough, but the Black crime rates against Whites are actually many times greater than White on Black crimes. Blacks are an estimated 57 (that is 5,700 percent!) times more likely to commit violent crime against a white than vice versa, and 136 times (13,600 percent!) more likely to commit robbery. (see the color of crime report published by the New Century Foundation – an analysis of crime figures taken from official Justice Department crime reports) http://www.nc-f.org/

Perhaps the most shocking of all the crime data dealing with cross-race crime is the incredible rate of crime by Black males against White women. According to U.S. Justice Department figures over 34,460 White women are sexually assaulted or raped by Black men each year, and most authorities believe that the actual rape figures are at least twice the reported number. In perhaps the most shocking crime figure of all is the number of White rapes against Black women. Statistically, it is 0! Because they have fewer than 10 cases nationally.

According to murder figures released by the Justice Department in 2002, , Black predators are at least 22 times (2,200 percent) more likely to murder White women than the reverse. In regard to gang attacks including the horrible specter of gang rape, the figures are literally off the charts, with at least a 200 times (that’s 20,000 percent!) greater chance of Blacks committing gang assaults and that includes both White men and women victims!

The staggering personal tragedies connected with these huge crime numbers should be a national scandal. Yet, the facts go largely unreported. How many times have the public seen media portrayals of historical or contemporary racial discrimination against Black people. But, the question is, “In the terms of the most important of human rights, how does the discrimination of racially segregated water fountains or neighborhoods or schools compare with the racially born crimes of black slaughter and physical attacks levied against thousands of White people each year?

America has been treated to thousands of media articles for instance about the frontier-style vigilante justice of lynchings, events which have occurred at least since the time of the American Revolution when they began on the Virginia frontier. Lynching got its name from Colonel Charles Lynch of Bedford County. He defended his community against outlaws and against Tories who were treacherously aiding the British. The Lynch organizations not only captured suspicious characters but gave them trials. With the frontier moving west and often with not a single law enforcement officer for hundreds of miles, vigilante committees often hunted down criminals and meted out punishment which was called “lynching.”

Lynching also became prominent again in the face of terrible outrages against innocent women and children during the Black Reconstruction period in the South and was mostly employed there against suspected Black rapists and murderers, but lynching was often practiced against Whites in the South, and quite often against criminal Whites in the North and West.

Of course, everyone today naturally condemns the practice of lynching, as well they should. Mob violence cannot be defended. But, if one wants to characterize lynching as a racial crime because lynchings were more commonly employed against Blacks in the South than against Whites, a few facts must be taken into account. If one considers disproportionate rates of Black lynching in the South, one must also consider the Black disproportionate crime rate.

1) Many scholars who have studied the history of lynching in the United States make it clear that lynching wasn’t simply a racial crime, but one primarily exacted on criminals whether they were Black or White. Consider the fact that even today, Blacks commit more murders than Whites in the United States, and Blacks are many times more likely to commit interracial race crimes such as rape and murder. As pointed out by federal crimes studies, a Black man is 57 times more likely to commit a violent crime against Whites than vice-versa, thousands of times more likely to rape a White women than Whites are likely to rape Black women, and 22 times more likely to murder a White woman than vice versa. There is no reason not to suspect that similar extremely high rates of Black criminality have existed historically. Most of the lynchings up until the War Between the States were against Whites and Significant numbers of Whites in the late 19th and early 20th Century were also lynched. So, considering the rates of crime, historical lynching has always been proportionate to Black crime rates and not one simply based on racist motives.

2) One must also understand that historical lynching was most often applied to those guilty of rape, robbery or murder. Of course, there were cases where innocent men were lynched, but in contrast, the thousands of White women and other White victims of Black crime today are guilty of no crime. Lynching cannot be excused in any way, but most of those men lynched were undoubtedly guilty of vicious and horrible crimes against the innocent, especially against women and children. Those were the kinds of heinous crimes that really drove the extra-legal executions.

The U.S. Senate recently issued an apology for not historically taking a stand against lynching, something that has been condemned because for part of its history Blacks disproportionately suffered from it.

If that is deemed appropriate, why does the U.S. Senate stand mute against the brutal rape of over 34,000 White women per year by Blacks. In just one year the number of White women raped by Black males is 6 times the total number of all lynchings during the entire history of the United States. (Estimated to be about 5,000 including both Whites and Blacks)

If racial disparity is an issue, then the Black rate of murder and rape against White men and women has a far greater racial disparity than that of White and Black lynchings. Remember, according to the U.S. Justice Department official figures, 34,000 White women were sexually assaulted compared to less than ten Black women assaulted by White men.

One should also consider that the victims of lynching were men; only a small number were women (estimates are between 75 and 100 women lynched in the history of the United States), and most of those were lynched for crimes committed along with their male criminal partners. Compare the small number of women who suffered lynching compared to the 34,000 women who suffer from Black rape every year. In addition, 700 innocent White women are murdered each and every year by Blacks. Where is the outrage about this racial crime?

If one wants to talk about moral outrages, the historical lynching of men who were overwhelmingly criminal and guilty of horrendous crimes, is quite minor compared to the mass murder and rape of the innocent going on literally as you read these lines. While you are reading this article another White woman will suffer rape at the hands of a Black man. (One White woman every 9 minutes if you accept the conventional wisdom that less than half of rapes are reported).

Next time someone comes up and tells you about the horrors of Jim Crow and segregation, how it was so terribly awful that African Americans, as well as White Americans lived in their own neighborhoods, went to their own schools, and even drank from their own water fountains, think about that supposed horror compared to horrendous violations of the most important civil right of all, the right to live and not suffer grievous personal assault or even death.

The fact of the matter is that Blacks as well as the Whites of America were a lot safer in the days of “evil segregation” than we are now. When America was a nation living by the values of White heritage, culture, standards and civilization, most Black kids were born legitimate in two parent families, they were not being shot down by each other on the steps of their homes, millions were not enslaved by drugs, half of them were not in prison or in some part of the criminal justice system. In a real sense, for countless millions of African Americans, the most important civil and human rights of all have been lost by the so-called victories of the civil rights movement.

For Whites the change has been just as dramatic. Millions of our people are now victims of Black robbery, rape, and murder. Millions of White boys and girls whose parents can’t afford private or parochial education, suffer in mostly Black public schools filled with sexual and physical intimidation, filthy language and dismal standards, drugs and the violence of the “gangsta rap” culture, a culture that violates the sanctity of womanhood and all of the most basic of human rights.

Millions more of our elderly are practically home prisoners in their own neighborhoods. Let the media and government tell them about the supposed civil rights and blessings of forced integration. Millions more of hardworking, better-qualified White, middle-class people suffer from the racial discrimination of so-called affirmative action. Constant government and media concern about “civil rights” is the greatest con job in history, because so-called civil rights has taken away practically every conceivable civil right of the American people, including the most important one of all, the right to live and the right not to be physically abused, or raped, or robbed or hurt.

Let the government and media drone on about Black “civil rights” to the grieving parents of Eve Carson and Lauren Burk, two bright and beautiful White women who were so full of love and life but who now have lost the most precious civil right of all, the right to life itself.

They were murdered not just by the predators on our streets, but by a media and government establishment who stripped away their right to live a safe and full life. They were murdered by media who have lied to the American people about the joys of multiracialism and multiculturalism. It is a media that constantly tell us the wonderful and loving future we have in America as it is subversively morphed into a mostly non-White nation. It is the same media who have instilled collective White guilt for real or imagined crimes of White history, but have hidden the terrible crimes going on against us, our heritage, freedom and survival, right before our eyes.

Lauren and Eva were murdered by the politicians who sold us out for the bloc votes and for the approval of media that celebrates the coming extinction of our people, faith, heritage and nation. They have also sold their souls and ours to the Jewish money men of American politics who make them pledge their subservience to Israel as a quote, “Jewish State for the Jewish people,” while they would not even dare to invoke the term “White people” except in denigration and apology.

Eva and Lauren no longer have breath in their bodies. To the last moments of their lives they probably never for an instant understood why they lost their lives. They probably never knew that our people were in a desperate struggle for their existence, and they probably never dreamed they could be a casualty in that war.

Eva and Lauren are gone now. They cannot speak to us except by what they left behind. But, they cannot be forgotten. We who are aware of the crisis facing our people will remember them. We will remember them as they were, beautiful expressions of humanity made unique and special by their own efforts and by the imprint of our people’s DNA spiral.

All of us at davidduke.com are dedicated to the preservation of what they were, and what they are, in us.

For, in the end, the most important civil right of all, is life.

David Duke

Spoken MP3

________________________________________

Here's the Shocking Proof:

37,460 Reported Black Rapes or Sexual Assaults on Whites --

Zero White sexual attacks on Blacks!

Some people wrote to me and cursed me out saying my facts on the huge number of Black sexual attacks on White women could not be true. Here is a screen shot montage of the most up-to-date crime facts direct from the U.S. Department of Justice which monitors all types of crime categorized by race of the offender and race of the victim. http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pub/pdf/cvus0502.pdf

As you can see, Black offenders committed 37,460 rapes or sexual assaults against White women (shown by simply taking the percentage from the total). The same chart shows that Whites committed 0 (zero to less than ten) sexual attacks against Black women. (The number of reported White sexual attacks on Blacks is so low it is statistically 0)

I got some letters condemning me for even publishing these government figures. They accused me of being racist for simply publishing these government reports,”It makes Black males look bad” they tell me. Isn’t it ironic that these people are so worried about how Black males might look, but they aren’t in the least concerned about the 37, 460 White women who have suffered the terror and harm of rape and sexual abuse. (In actual reality the number of Black rapes against White women is at least double the Justice Department figure because those are just the reported rapes). And these figures are just one year’s attacks; similar rates of attack of White women occur year after year.

Next time you hear on TV or read in the media how racist and terrible White folks are to Black people think about the 37,460 White women who are raped by Blacks and the fact that no nationally known political figure (except me) even dares to mention it. If the numbers were reversed and White men were raping Black women by the tens of thousands, our cities would burn! But, we White folks are not supposed to object to this horrendous attack on White women and girls. Heck, we are not even supposed to know about it. I think we should know about it, and I think we must take action to protect White women from this horrible crime.

–Dr. David Duke

DavidDuke.com

[Glacier]

Right FZN!!!!

[AngloUniter]

I grew up around negroes (not as friends but in an area with blacks) and the statistics are wrong! There are twice as much crimes commited by black men on white women than are reported. Trust me...I know at least 25 white girls that have been assualted by apes. Half of the time they drop the charges for fear of retribution. I went to college with a girl that was raped by a negro just a year ago. She came into class distraught and distressed. The police did not do anything because the police were also black, and the city was highly populated by australos. The same guy was accused in two other instances. It was her fault anyway. She dated monkeys and was in the wrong place at the wrong time. She is so dumb that she still dates apes!
The statistics are wrong...they are way under what they should be!

[FREE ZUNDEL NOW]

Obama Wins Demo Nomination:
A Black Flag for White America

By Rep. David Duke

In auto racing, a black flag is the signal used for the car to go to the pits. Barack Obama winning the Democrat Nomination is a black flag for America, a sign of where we as a people and nation are heading… to the pits.

In reality, Barack Hussein Obama is no more of a danger to the interests of the White American than Hillary Clinton or John McCain. Perhaps he is even less of one, for when traitors have become your own leaders they are much more dangerous to you than a powerful enemy outside of your own ranks.

Still, Obama is a signal flag that European Americans have lost control
over the government of the nation they founded, a nation that when it was at its best was the epitome of the dreams of Western man. In a sense, America being composed of every heritage of Europe embodied a collective will of our European folk, a power that created great documents of freedom and wonderful examples of courage, and it embodied a national will that accomplished clearly the greatest technological and physical achievement in the history of mankind, the placing of European mankind’s footprints on the moon.

Contemporary to that American lunar accomplishment, the seeds of destruction were sown in the racist, anti-European, Immigration Reform Act, an act that discriminates against European immigrants (like us) and favors the Third World. In those years the media and its all-seeing-eye of television, fell under the iron grip of a small tribe of non-Europeans who nurtured ancient hatreds against us since the time our Greek and Roman European forbears conquered their scraggy patch of land which w
as anything but holy.

Now, the dreams of our forefathers have morphed into our own living nightmares in which anti-White racism and White self-hate dominate the political and media landscape. Millions of our people face massive racial discrimination in the new-speak of “affirmative action.”�”� We have lost the educational system our people created and made one of the best in the world, to the point where millions of our people can’t send their kids to the schools their own taxes pay for, where their children not only face educational mediocrity, but often the far worse fate of physical beating, sexual assault and drug environment of our our gangsta, and gangsta rap-infested schools. Our people find their taxes being doled out by the billions for the medical care and welfare of illegal aliens and welfare cheats while millions of our hard working can’t get or can’t afford the most basic of medical insurance. We spend trillions of dollars of American tax money in foreign wars orchestrated by those
in our midst who are themselves foreign to every value of America and who are themselves loyal to a foreign nation. Must I invoke the two names of the chief orchestrators of the Iraq War, the Jewish extremists, Wolfowitz and Perle? Does anyone really still believe that the Iraq War is on behalf of America?

These same supremacists who have us die and go bankrupt for Israel as a segregated, supremacist, “Jewish State,”�”� tell us that it is evil for White Americans to preserve our civil rights, our heritage, our traditions and our values in the nation we founded. Not content with destroying the European heritage of our own country, they now use the military and economic, media and social might of the United States to influence and destroy the racial foundations of every White nation on earth. The aliens who control the media and political establishment of the United States use the might of our country to support every degenerate and destructive policy imaginable, from open borders to a pornographically
sick international media, where every kind of sickness. perversion, immorality, dishonesty and ugliness is relentlessly promoted.

Obama, though not appreciably different in policies from Clinton or McCain, is symbolic of that transfer of the control of America from White to anti-White. However, he is not the author of his success. He is the result of decades of anti-White propaganda promoted by the alien media and he is the result, as are McCain and Clinton, of millions of dollars of Jewish agenda money illustrated by Obama’s biggest campaign contributor, Goldmann, Sachs. He is propelled by the dynamics of Black and minority racism, and the anti-White racism instilled in far too many of our own kind. The fact that so many Whites would support him even after his twenty year membership in an anti-White church is indicative of the media instilled sickness in so many of our own people. These are brainwashed Whites who would believe that a White man standing up for his people’s interests is the epitome
of evil, but a Black man doing it is the epitome of goodness. Of course, in the long run even Obama can’t put the interests of Black people first, or the interest of the American majority. The Jewish minority whose radical advocates are in the key positions of the American media, American finance and the political fundraising, they are the real rulers, rulers for whom Obama has already bent over.

The government and media establishment are embarked on a catastrophic agenda to make European Americans an eventual political minority in the nation they founded. And over all of this degenerating multicultural, multiracial menagerie, stirring this boiling cauldron of a toxic melting pot, sits the ultimate racists, the Jewish supremacists and their sycophants. Anyone who seeks any office in America, from President of the United States down to town dog catcher must pass the ultimate litmus test of eagerness to put the interests of Israel over that of the United States. Obama has passed the test, he has genufl
ected before the one unassailable power in the United States, the one power that no one can criticize, that no one is even allowed to acknowledge, and that no one can refuse to obey without career-ending consequences. McCain has long since proven his obsquiesence to the Jewish extremists, and he has long since proven his role as White race traitor by being a co-sponsor of the amnesty bill that would speed up the already horrifyingly rapid demise of the America of our fathers and mothers.

In truth, McCain, being at least a White man on the outside, and being the top Republican, can marshal far more support for anti-White programs in the U.S. Congress than could Obama. No republican or conservative Democrat would have too much trouble opposing Obama’s Amnesty, it could be an endearing mark of honor for many. But, many Republicans would be forced by party loyalty and party committee assignments and the like to support catastrophic policies proposed by McCain, policies McCain has already supported and th
at surely he will support again.

America has marched steadily toward catastrophe since the 1930s. Whether it was Hoover or Roosevelt, Truman or Eisenhower, Kennedy or Johnson or Nixon or even Ronald Reagan, American policy has moved steadily toward the destruction of the European American community in America. Bush is perhaps the epitome of everything wrong with the American political establishment. He sounds like a God-fearing, patriotic American but stands for everything that will literally wipe our people off the map.

Obama will be no worse than any of the White sell-outs that came before him.

But, Obama will be a signal, a clear signal for millions of our people. Obama is a visual aid for millions of White Americans who just don’t get it yet that we have lost the control of our country and unless we get it back, we are heading for complete annihilation as a people in the United States of America.

Obama is like that new big dark spot on your arm that finally sends you to the
doctor for some real medicine.

Obama is the pain that let’s your body know that something is dreadfully wrong.

Obama will let the American people know that there is a real cancer eating away at the heart of our country and Republican aspirin will not only not cure it, but only masks the pain and makes you think you don’t need radical surgery.

Obama is the telltale X-ray.

Obama is the wake up call.

The elite that controls the media and government are pushing Obama down our throats.

My bet is that whether Obama wins or loses come November, Millions of European Americans will inevitably react with a new awareness of their heritage and the need for them to defend and advance it.

Obama’s winning the Democratic nomination will usher in a new age of racially conscious American politics. The minorities have long had this consciousness. They have been voting in blocs for decades.

Now it is our turn.

The Obama nomination draws the lines of racial dema
rcation in America.

He helps make everything very clear to our people. He paves the way for thousands of other candidates on the American horizon, White candidates who will stand up for our own people the way that Obama stands up for his. –David Duke

Source

Hear Don Black & Dr. David Duke
Discuss This Article On SF-Radio!

www.DavidDuke.com

[Smedley Butler]

Excellent post thank you.

[William of the White Hand]

He helps make everything very clear to our people. He paves the way for thousands of other candidates on the American horizon, White candidates who will stand up for our own people the way that Obama stands up for his. –David Duke

More wishful thinking on Duke's part methinks.